Director of Party’s Over, Alvise Pérez, he is until the following October 12 to present before the Court of Accounts their accounting of choices. From that day, the information provided by this design and all the other games that participated in the European Championship last June will be evaluated by Department of political parties of the governing body prepare a report that will verify whether the numbers provided are compliant with the regulations or not.
In Alvise’s case, the focus is on knowing whether they will announce the 100,000 euros or not that a businessman he was associated with said that he gave him money to campaign outside the Court of Auditors. In an appearance on his Telegram channel, the MEP said that the payment was for the work he did as a freelancer and he admits that he did not declare it to the Treasury, because he considered it a “mafia.”
Sources from the organization that oversees the audit of public accounts told the newspaper that the report written by the party will be approved by the regional assembly and submitted to the Cortes. In the event that any training does not provide his accounts, the court will notify the Ministry of the Interior so that he is not excluded from future support. and help.
The procedure before the regulatory body does not fully correspond to what will follow the complaint that was presented to the prosecutor’s office by Álvaro Romillo, who is known on the Internet as CryptoSpain, against himself and Alvise, and before the International Court of Justice for being injured by the “financial ringgit. “What Merchant set up to manage the community to sell and buy the digital art he created, Madeira Invest Club.
The Technical Secretariat of the Attorney General’s Office sent Romillo’s complaint to the judges of the Supreme Court with the understanding that this fact could be a crime of giving money unrelated to political parties under Article 304 ter of the Penal Code, which is punishable by “the penalty of imprisonment of one to five years, who works in organizations or institutions, whether its nature, whose purpose is to raise money for political partiesorganizations, associations or groups of voters, outside the law“, tax sources told this newspaper.
In his complaint, Romillo is alleged to have given Alvise 100,000 euros to campaign for European women through his employee in the Sentinel office in Madrid, a business he allegedly created to manage his sales revenue. digital arts and how, among other things, it provides “people-to-people exchange of crypto and money” and “5,000 anonymous safe deposit boxes”. The complaint in which the merchant accuses himself before the prosecutor’s office states that “these transactions are not recorded, do not appear in any registry, or are monitored,” because “the exchange that is taking place is not known.”
And this is what would have attracted the MEP judging by the messages on WhatsApp and Signal that he would have crossed paths with Romillo to create Wallets (digital cards) where you can earn money all about the people who call them”squirrels”, who are supposed to inform him about corruption, about the election campaign last June without details. According to the photos in Romillos’ complaint, Alvise urged him to raise money ahead of the election because of the long delay.
All of these are difficult to relate to the law on the financing of political parties and the election law (Longa). The first article 5 prohibits special donations exceeding 50,000 euros, as well as anonymous, final or canceled donations, which come from the same person or from authorized persons and organizations without legal personality. Add to that youtotal donation of more than 25,000 euros and in any case, housing contributions, should be reported to the Court of Auditors and a political party within three months of approval.
For its part, loreg only provides for the use of bank accounts. Article 125 obliges the party management to communicate with the Central Electoral Board and Provincial Boards “accounts that are opened to collect funds”, whose opening, it says, ““can be done, from the date of appointment of election officials, in the Banking Entity or Savings Bank.”.
Sources consulted insist that The Court of Auditors only analyzes the information submitted by each party. The documents must contain evidence of expenses and expenses as well as financial reports of campaign activities, as well as sending false information during elections. Information about the election process takes precedence over the annual accounts, which are also required to be submitted.
That is why the election reports are known even before the end of a year after the elections have been held (those of the May 23 elections in Murcia and La Rioja, for example, were known last February). On the other hand, the annual political accounts have arrived up to four years late, based on the information presented this week to Congress by the President of the Court, Enriqueta Chicanowhich is from 2020.